# Julia can be better at doing web: A benchmark

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-can-be-better-at-doing-web-a-benchmark/103300>\
**Category:** Web Stack\
**Tags:** performance, benchmark, sockets, http\
**Created:** [August 28, 2023, 4:47pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-can-be-better-at-doing-web-a-benchmark/103300 "2023-08-28T16:47:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbauman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mbauman/32/31082_2.png) [@mbauman](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mbauman)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2023, 1:16pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-can-be-better-at-doing-web-a-benchmark/103300/10 "2023-08-29T13:16:55Z")

</div>

Oxygen uses HTTP.jl without much extra configuration, so I’d expect very similar experience. If I’m not mistaken, your [previous benchmarks](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/oxygen-jl-is-faster-than-fastapi-flask-and-rocket/100389) were 1000 single-threaded requests. This is looking at hundreds of thousands of requests at high concurrency.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-can-be-better-at-doing-web-a-benchmark/103300)._