When discussing relative language popularity, please, please, please don’t use TIOBE as a source of anything meaningful — it’s methodology is so deeply flawed it means hardly anything. Instead, use rankings with reasonable methodologies like IEEE and PYPL. According to PYPL, which was the most pessimistic about Julia’s ranking at the year’s start (TIOBE had Julia at #23 at the time), Go is 3.8x more popular than Julia. But Python is 23x more popular than Go. Yet nobody is wringing their hands over Go’s failure or lack of growth. Considering Go’s three year head start and massive corporate backing from Google, the actual question it seems like people ought to be asking is “how has Julia, without any large corporate sponsorship, been so wildly successful in such a short time?”
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Can juliac increase julia adoption? | 61 | 3959 | April 14, 2025 | |
| How do we Julians win big when the situation is so unfair? | 100 | 6209 | November 22, 2023 | |
| "At present, Julia is a/an ________ programming language. " Fill in the blank with the most appropriate adjective | 50 | 2473 | April 23, 2026 | |
| What Python Creator Guido van Rossum Thinks of Rust, Go, Julia, and TypeScript | 88 | 11941 | June 8, 2021 | |
| Losing Science Marketshare to Non-Python Languages | 30 | 3291 | September 21, 2022 |