I’m interested in potentially better scoping rules but those will be breaking changes. (I have read the PSA: Julia is not at that stage of development anymore ). When is Julia 2.0 planned to come? Is changing scoping rules for that admissible, beyond just making the rules in REPL and files be the …

About question 1, a 2.0 version is not planned at the moment, it may or may not happen at all.

Imho, scoping rules seem to pop-up here mainly because they are different than in some other popular languages. They are not bad though – in the sense of needing to be fixed – and work quite nicely for interactively exploring things julia> tmp = 0 0 julia> for x in 1:10 tmp += x …

Julia 2.0, new scope rules, and other breaking changes

Internals & Design

gdalle May 17, 2025, 8:53am 5

See e.g. Is Julia 2.0 needed?

Topic		Replies	Views
Gratuitous, Annoying Changes for Julie 2.0 Offtopic humor	64	9450	June 17, 2022
Toward a real and final solution to Julia’s variable scope issue Internals & Design	37	2547	June 8, 2023
Will any Julia 1.x contain substantive breaking changes? Internals & Design	14	1592	October 26, 2022
Stating my opininon Community releases	37	3732	October 10, 2018
Tips to cope with scoping rules of top level `for` loops etc General Usage scope	30	6960	February 12, 2021

Julia 2.0, new scope rules, and other breaking changes

Related topics