# Julia 1.11 is slower than 1.10?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-1-11-is-slower-than-1-10/121077>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** regression\
**Created:** [October 9, 2024, 2:21am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-1-11-is-slower-than-1-10/121077 "2024-10-09T02:21:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lmiq](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/lmiq/32/18314_2.png) [@lmiq](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/lmiq)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2024, 9:13pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-1-11-is-slower-than-1-10/121077/19 "2024-10-09T21:13:56Z")

</div>

> [@karei](#):
>
> : 14.09 MiB, allocs estimate: 82728 estimate: 82728, I don’t know where the extra 30,000 allocations came from.

The _number_ of allocations, if the performance does not decrease, is not necessarily an issue. Some of this was discussed here: [Increase in allocations with Julia v1.11-beta](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/increase-in-allocations-with-julia-v1-11-beta/112838)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-1-11-is-slower-than-1-10/121077)._