# Is there a strong case that Julia is a more composable language?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-there-a-strong-case-that-julia-is-a-more-composable-language/118554>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** question, python\
**Created:** [August 24, 2024, 10:26am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-there-a-strong-case-that-julia-is-a-more-composable-language/118554 "2024-08-24T10:26:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![goretkin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/goretkin/32/167_2.png) [@goretkin](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/goretkin)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2024, 6:41pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-there-a-strong-case-that-julia-is-a-more-composable-language/118554/8 "2024-08-24T18:41:39Z")

</div>

I like this example demonstrating python’s built-in complex type being only over float, leading to an inability to express complex rational numbers in the stdlib: [Is Julia's way of OOP superior to C++/Python? Why Julia doesn't use class-based OOP? - #92 by goretkin](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-julias-way-of-oop-superior-to-c-python-why-julia-doesnt-use-class-based-oop/52058/92)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-there-a-strong-case-that-julia-is-a-more-composable-language/118554)._