# Is Julia 2.0 needed?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-julia-2-0-needed/120842
**Category:** Internals & Design
**Created:** [October 3, 2024, 7:45am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-julia-2-0-needed/120842 "2024-10-03T07:45:57Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![co1emi11er](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/co1emi11er/32/206849_2.png) [@co1emi11er](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/co1emi11er)
#### Post date: [October 3, 2024, 8:25pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-julia-2-0-needed/120842/33 "2024-10-03T20:25:11Z")

</div>

> [@jbytecode](#):
>
> is almost the same for both of two languages.
> 
> No gains, no losses, just some cosmetic differences. The Julia implementation is shorter. I think OOP was more of a GUI hype following the evolution of Windows, and there’s no real need for it in non-GUI contexts.

The biggest thing for me in OOP is the `object.method()` syntax. The feedback you get from the lsp when hitting the `.` is my biggest wish in julia.

This doesn’t need to even be a `.`, just some piping syntax that the lsp could use to then do a methodswith() call that would be filtered by package, so I could see most relevant methods would be amazing. Calling methodswith myself does not compare.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-julia-2-0-needed/120842)._