# Intel Mkl Windows building

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/intel-mkl-windows-building/25033>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** windows, blas, mkl, build\
**Created:** [June 7, 2019, 6:44am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/intel-mkl-windows-building/25033 "2019-06-07T06:44:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jlperla](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jlperla/32/34332_2.png) [@jlperla](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jlperla)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2019, 2:13am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/intel-mkl-windows-building/25033/7 "2019-06-09T02:13:04Z")

</div>

> [@Amin\_Yahyaabadi](#):
>
> Yes. That has not been updated for several months, and apparently it has some issues in it.

If there are issues, I would love to know. We are trying to make sure it is a functional setup using it. At this point, the key is that you need to package compile it into the image, which works well.

The other issues (eg arpack and suitsparse incompatibility) are known, but the issue is the mkl itself, rather than that specific package. Ie building with mkl has the same problems, as far as I understand

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/intel-mkl-windows-building/25033)._