# Implicitly loaded modules in the future?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/implicitly-loaded-modules-in-the-future/62646>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** question, module, code-organization\
**Created:** [June 9, 2021, 8:58pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/implicitly-loaded-modules-in-the-future/62646 "2021-06-09T20:58:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jzr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/eb9ed0/32.png) [@jzr](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jzr)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2021, 9:10pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/implicitly-loaded-modules-in-the-future/62646/4 "2021-06-09T21:10:45Z")

</div>

I think this is the same issue discussed here

> [@\[ANN\] PatModules.jl: a better module system for Julia](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-patmodules-jl-a-better-module-system-for-julia/52226/38):
>
> Okay, quite a lot to unpack here. Some quotes-with-answers deliberately out of chronological order for better presentation. I’ll start off by apologising if I’ve come across the wrong way. I certainly don’t mean to offend anyone. Clearly I have a controversial opinion – I am trying to express disagreement without derogation. I’ll restate that for emphasis: I absolutely don’t mean to cause offense. Thanks for the welcome! Okay, let’s get into the meat of this. I’m constructing a module/pac…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/implicitly-loaded-modules-in-the-future/62646)._