# Idiomatic Julia code in AI generated code

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/idiomatic-julia-code-in-ai-generated-code/139183
**Category:** General Usage
**Tags:** ai
**Created:** [September 3, 2026, 8:12am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/idiomatic-julia-code-in-ai-generated-code/139183 "2026-09-03T08:12:37Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![adienes](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/adienes/32/37459_2.png) [@adienes](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/adienes)
#### Post date: [September 3, 2026, 10:26pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/idiomatic-julia-code-in-ai-generated-code/139183/9 "2026-09-03T22:26:02Z")

</div>

> [@ParadaCarleton](#):
>
> This is mostly because Julia lacks the static checking used for informed speculative decoding and RLVF (Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Feedback) in other programming languages.

that sentence is a complete non-sequitur; neither of those techniques you’re name-dropping require nor have anything to do with static typing.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/idiomatic-julia-code-in-ai-generated-code/139183)._