# I implemented a type for defining arbitrary lazy sequences that performs well, but the implementation is so trivial that I'm not sure if it's worth making a package

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-implemented-a-type-for-defining-arbitrary-lazy-sequences-that-performs-well-but-the-implementation-is-so-trivial-that-im-not-sure-if-its-worth-making-a-package/35875
**Category:** Package Announcements
**Created:** [March 12, 2020, 10:06am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-implemented-a-type-for-defining-arbitrary-lazy-sequences-that-performs-well-but-the-implementation-is-so-trivial-that-im-not-sure-if-its-worth-making-a-package/35875 "2020-03-12T10:06:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jakub\_Wronowski](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jakub_wronowski/32/204030_2.png) [@Jakub\_Wronowski](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Jakub_Wronowski)
#### Post date: [March 12, 2020, 10:15am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-implemented-a-type-for-defining-arbitrary-lazy-sequences-that-performs-well-but-the-implementation-is-so-trivial-that-im-not-sure-if-its-worth-making-a-package/35875/2 "2020-03-12T10:15:20Z")

</div>

> [@ninjaaron](#):
>
> Is anyone else interested in this kind of thing? Would it be worth packaging it up and distributing it?

I think so but it seems opening PR somewhere will be better. See this topic, it looks similar: [Julia equivalence of Haskells unfoldr](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-equivalence-of-haskells-unfoldr/17834)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-implemented-a-type-for-defining-arbitrary-lazy-sequences-that-performs-well-but-the-implementation-is-so-trivial-that-im-not-sure-if-its-worth-making-a-package/35875)._