# I don’t want to read LLM output

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-don-t-want-to-read-llm-output/139244>\
**Category:** Meta Discussion\
**Created:** [September 7, 2026, 2:28pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-don-t-want-to-read-llm-output/139244 "2026-09-07T14:28:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 125

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PetrKryslUCSD](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/petrkryslucsd/32/215825_2.png) [@PetrKryslUCSD](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/PetrKryslUCSD)\
**Post date:** [September 10, 2026, 1:06am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-don-t-want-to-read-llm-output/139244/125 "2026-09-10T01:06:22Z")

</div>

God knows I am not enthused about AI in its various guises, but I do question the tendency expressed from various quarters here to proscribe posts produced with AI (LLM, …). If it is good enough to write technical documentation (with a tweak here and there by the supervising human), why not post text written partially with that technology? I would probably not enjoy reading something entirely written by the tool, I admit that.

So, why not have a rule that a post produced (partially or fully with LLMs) must be labeled as such prominently at the top? That way, someone hating AI-produced text can skip it, and we are not overly prescriptive as to the communication technology in use.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/i-don-t-want-to-read-llm-output/139244)._