@Benny , thank you for the insights.
I’ll not be able to put much work into this in the following days - but before updating that PR, I would really like to somehow validate this (and your idea of a standalone package where we can iterate fast seems attractive indeed).
I wrote this a while back - and this was the exact rationale: to have a fast-moving environment where we can iterate/validate ideas. Also, don’t wait for the slow-paced review process (and this is not a critique - I just admit the existing/expected constraints) before making valuable stuff available to the community.
I might revisit that idea.