# How is a state of subscript notation in Julia 1.x?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-is-a-state-of-subscript-notation-in-julia-1-x/17101>\
**Category:** New to Julia\
**Created:** [November 2, 2018, 8:32pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-is-a-state-of-subscript-notation-in-julia-1-x/17101 "2018-11-02T20:32:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbauman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mbauman/32/31082_2.png) [@mbauman](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mbauman)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2018, 8:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-is-a-state-of-subscript-notation-in-julia-1-x/17101/4 "2018-11-02T20:52:57Z")

</div>

> [@KZiemian](#):
>
> even as in Unicode table is defined

Unfortunately, it’s one of the missing subscripts in unicode — see the table on the Wikipedia page @mauro3 linked. Unicode simply has not defined superscript q or subscripts b, c, d, f, g, q, w, y, z. It’s all very silly.

See [GitHub - stevengj/subsuper-proposal: Draft proposal for additional sub/superscript characters in Unicode](https://github.com/stevengj/subsuper-proposal) for a draft proposal to the Unicode standards committee to try to rectify the situation.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-is-a-state-of-subscript-notation-in-julia-1-x/17101)._
