# How can we create a leaner ecosystem for Julia?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904>\
**Category:** Statistics\
**Tags:** package, proposal, time-series, machine-learning\
**Created:** [January 3, 2020, 1:35am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904 "2020-01-03T01:35:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 95

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gunter\_Faes](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/gunter_faes/32/12580_2.png) [@Gunter\_Faes](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Gunter_Faes)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2020, 2:55pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904/95 "2020-01-10T14:55:58Z")

</div>

I am thinking back and forth about whether I should prolong the discussion with another post. Many things were discussed and I would like to come back to the _ **quality indicators** _. They should directly point out the quality of the package to the user and make a decision of use easier. After all, achieving a high ranking is certainly an incentive. Let me make a visual suggestion (Flux is just a value-free example):

 ![Julia Package rating system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/original/3X/c/9/c93fdc9f6f39b1f9df96759006060ae413ed22af.jpeg)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904)._