# How can we create a leaner ecosystem for Julia?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904>\
**Category:** Statistics\
**Tags:** package, proposal, time-series, machine-learning\
**Created:** [January 3, 2020, 1:35am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904 "2020-01-03T01:35:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juliohm](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/juliohm/32/215266_2.png) [@juliohm](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/juliohm)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2020, 2:38pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904/54 "2020-01-05T14:38:39Z")

</div>

To add to the discussion on GitHub organizations, [evidence](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/diagonalizations-jl-a-package-for-multivariate-linear-filtering/32990/4) indicates that that they do not always improve discoverability of packages. I personally never search packages based on organizations. I do Google search or use [https://pkg.julialang.org](https://pkg.julialang.org) search. However, these organizations may boost the credibility of packages found via other methods, and thus create a collaboration hub. They also may increase the willingness of others to contribute with code.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-can-we-create-a-leaner-ecosystem-for-julia/32904)._