# Gurobi12 reports obj\_value \< obj\_bound in a Min-Program?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/gurobi12-reports-obj-value-obj-bound-in-a-min-program/126849>\
**Category:** Optimization (Mathematical)\
**Tags:** jump, gurobi\
**Created:** [March 12, 2025, 8:09am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/gurobi12-reports-obj-value-obj-bound-in-a-min-program/126849 "2025-03-12T08:09:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WalterMadelim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/3e96dc/32.png) [@WalterMadelim](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/WalterMadelim)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2025, 12:52pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/gurobi12-reports-obj-value-obj-bound-in-a-min-program/126849/9 "2025-03-12T12:52:15Z")

</div>

I think `JuMP.primal_status` is somewhat unimportant, given the presence of `JuMP.has_values`. I’ve just written a rigorous procedure about this, please see [About JuMP.is\_solved\_and\_feasible](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/about-jump-is-solved-and-feasible/126868).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/gurobi12-reports-obj-value-obj-bound-in-a-min-program/126849)._