# Grassmann.jl A\\b 3x faster than Julia's StaticArrays.jl

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/grassmann-jl-a-b-3x-faster-than-julias-staticarrays-jl/41451>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Tags:** package, announcement, array\
**Created:** [June 15, 2020, 4:12pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/grassmann-jl-a-b-3x-faster-than-julias-staticarrays-jl/41451 "2020-06-15T16:12:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jameson](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jameson/32/23_2.png) [@jameson](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jameson)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2020, 3:58pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/grassmann-jl-a-b-3x-faster-than-julias-staticarrays-jl/41451/13 "2020-06-16T15:58:44Z")

</div>

> willing to consider changing its application in any use of `Base.@pure` if it’s a mistake

You’re clearly not actually willing to, since it’s been pointed out before that the bug report mentioned above ([Mysterious internal error when using Grassmann.jl · Issue #31185 · JuliaLang/julia · GitHub](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/31185)) demonstrates that you are using it incorrectly and that it causes issues.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/grassmann-jl-a-b-3x-faster-than-julias-staticarrays-jl/41451)._