# Github contingency planning — should Julia be backing up issues/PRs?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/github-contingency-planning-should-julia-be-backing-up-issues-prs/101086>\
**Category:** Tooling\
**Created:** [July 2, 2023, 4:55pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/github-contingency-planning-should-julia-be-backing-up-issues-prs/101086 "2023-07-02T16:55:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tecosaur](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tecosaur/32/23206_2.png) [@tecosaur](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/tecosaur)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2023, 3:49pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/github-contingency-planning-should-julia-be-backing-up-issues-prs/101086/21 "2023-07-05T15:49:53Z")

</div>

I don’t think at this point a self-hosted forge as _the_ means of contributing to Julia is being seriously considered, just as an “oven-ready” backup approach.

[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/github-contingency-planning-should-julia-be-backing-up-issues-prs/101086.md?page=1)
