# Garbage collection not aggressive enough on Slurm Cluster

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/garbage-collection-not-aggressive-enough-on-slurm-cluster/61649>\
**Category:** Julia at Scale\
**Tags:** multithreading, garbage-collection\
**Created:** [May 22, 2021, 4:58pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/garbage-collection-not-aggressive-enough-on-slurm-cluster/61649 "2021-05-22T16:58:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dlakelan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/dlakelan/32/8491_2.png) [@dlakelan](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/dlakelan)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2021, 2:11pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/garbage-collection-not-aggressive-enough-on-slurm-cluster/61649/18 "2021-08-04T14:11:50Z")

</div>

It’s certainly not a strategy for general use, but in the OPs case it might work. There the problem is already known to be that GC needs to be called. The question is just when? I kinda like the ewma time budget version though

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/garbage-collection-not-aggressive-enough-on-slurm-cluster/61649)._
