# Fixing the Piping/Chaining/Partial Application Issue (Rev 2)

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408
**Category:** Internals & Design
**Tags:** proposal, piping, chaining, partial-evaluation, threading
**Created:** [November 17, 2022, 3:36pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408 "2022-11-17T15:36:57Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 37

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aplavin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/aplavin/32/222056_2.png) [@aplavin](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/aplavin)
#### Post date: [November 24, 2022, 8:35am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408/37 "2022-11-24T08:35:56Z")

</div>

> [@justinlaughlin](#):
>
> I currently use \<…\> data pipes \<…\>, and sometimes even just base Julia (I like the broadcast pipe syntax .|\>)

You may find the [new DataPipes release](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-datapipes-jl-0-3-0/60734/70) useful: I added the broadcast pipe support, after thinking about its expected semantics for some time.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408)._