# Fixing the Piping/Chaining/Partial Application Issue (Rev 2)

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** proposal, piping, chaining, partial-evaluation, threading\
**Created:** [November 17, 2022, 3:36pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408 "2022-11-17T15:36:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![uniment](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/uniment/32/24532_2.png) [@uniment](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/uniment)\
**Post date:** [November 26, 2022, 3:15am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408/42 "2022-11-26T03:15:25Z")

</div>

Like the last thread, I’m terminating this thread (or at least, talking about function chaining) because I’ve arrived at an [even better idea](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-issue-rev-3/90836). Please refrain from further comments on this post, unless they’re about partial function application and function composition!

[Previous page](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-partial-application-issue-rev-2/90408.md?page=2)
