# Fixing the Piping/Chaining Issue (Rev 3)

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-issue-rev-3/90836>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** multithreading, syntax, piping, chaining, threading\
**Created:** [November 26, 2022, 2:50am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-issue-rev-3/90836 "2022-11-26T02:50:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 61

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jar1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c0e974/32.png) [@jar1](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jar1)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2022, 6:53pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-issue-rev-3/90836/61 "2022-12-07T18:53:33Z")

</div>

> [@uniment](#):
>
> @jar1: We already have a shorter alternative to `begin a; b end` for blocks: `(a; b)` 😉

Yes, but `(a; b)` is horrible. That should be syntax for [FrankenTuples](https://ararslan.github.io/FrankenTuples.jl/latest/).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fixing-the-piping-chaining-issue-rev-3/90836)._