# Finding functions

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/finding-functions/105285>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** question, vscode\
**Created:** [October 22, 2023, 5:44pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/finding-functions/105285 "2023-10-22T17:44:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ToucheSir](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/touchesir/32/14411_2.png) [@ToucheSir](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/ToucheSir)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2023, 9:48pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/finding-functions/105285/7 "2023-10-23T21:48:04Z")

</div>

I believe @xgdgsc has a working proof-of-concept of postfix completion, which lets one still use the dot syntax for autocomplete. See [Allowing the object.method(args...) syntax as an alias for method(object, args ...) - #218 by xgdgsc](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/allowing-the-object-method-args-syntax-as-an-alias-for-method-object-args/62051/218). Last I checked, they were still trying to upstream it into the VS Code extension and Julia language server.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/finding-functions/105285)._