# Feedback on inconsistent naming of types for Julia v1.0 release

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/feedback-on-inconsistent-naming-of-types-for-julia-v1-0-release/7923>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** array, poll\
**Created:** [December 22, 2017, 6:34pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/feedback-on-inconsistent-naming-of-types-for-julia-v1-0-release/7923 "2017-12-22T18:34:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StefanKarpinski](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/stefankarpinski/32/24_2.png) [@StefanKarpinski](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/StefanKarpinski)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2017, 7:22pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/feedback-on-inconsistent-naming-of-types-for-julia-v1-0-release/7923/7 "2017-12-22T19:22:16Z")

</div>

Standard library packages will be versioned like other packages, which means you can lock their version and still upgrade Julia itself, which won’t break since it has API stability.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/feedback-on-inconsistent-naming-of-types-for-julia-v1-0-release/7923)._