# Experience report after finishing a (reasonably substantial) Julia project in 2024

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/experience-report-after-finishing-a-reasonably-substantial-julia-project-in-2024/113148>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [April 18, 2024, 2:17pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/experience-report-after-finishing-a-reasonably-substantial-julia-project-in-2024/113148 "2024-04-18T14:17:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 51

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gdalle](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/gdalle/32/27854_2.png) [@gdalle](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/gdalle)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2024, 8:41pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/experience-report-after-finishing-a-reasonably-substantial-julia-project-in-2024/113148/51 "2024-04-18T20:41:55Z")

</div>

> [@brianguenter](#):
>
> Can we add a prominent link on the Julia language home page to [ModernJuliaWorkflows](https://modernjuliaworkflows.github.io/)? Just like the Rust and Go examples? And then do our best as a community improve it and keep it to date, as we do with the rest of the Julia documentation?

Co-creator of [ModernJuliaWorkflows](https://modernjuliaworkflows.github.io/) here: contributions are always welcome!  
The initial goal was to contribute the posts to the Julia blog, but instead maybe our website deserves a life of its own? I could definitely see it becoming a less formal, more hand-holding companion to the detailed documentation. Of course, putting a link to MoJuWo in the [important links](https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/#man-important-links) section would make it seem more official than it is… but in Julia world there really isn’t such a thing as “official”, there is only “useful to the community”.  
If you’re wondering why all this stuff is not _already_ in the docs, see this previous discussion:

> [@Write documentation PRs not blog posts](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/write-documentation-prs-not-blog-posts/100942):
>
> I will start by saying I have read many useful blog posts and course notes that have been linked on this forum, and I greatly appreciate the effort that goes into making them. The problem is they are not discoverable. It is my opinion that these guides would be much better served as a “Tutorial” or “Usage Guide” section in the official documentation for each package. I would like to have a discussion about that stance and what we can do to improve discoverability of fundamental knowledge for new…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/experience-report-after-finishing-a-reasonably-substantial-julia-project-in-2024/113148)._