# Etiquette question on posting to Announcements

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/etiquette-question-on-posting-to-announcements/39193>\
**Category:** Meta Discussion\
**Created:** [May 9, 2020, 7:19pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/etiquette-question-on-posting-to-announcements/39193 "2020-05-09T19:19:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![oheil](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/oheil/32/220745_2.png) [@oheil](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/oheil)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2020, 7:36pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/etiquette-question-on-posting-to-announcements/39193/4 "2020-05-09T19:36:56Z")

</div>

I would say, this

> [@\[ANN\] LightGraphs v1.3.3 - another bugfix](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-lightgraphs-v1-3-3-another-bugfix/39191):
>
> Hi all, LightGraphs.jl has been updated to v1.3.3 to fix a bug in core\_number. No other changes have been made. I expect to have a cool LG announcement in the next few days. Please stay tuned smiley. Edited to add more detail: This is a bug in the correctness of core\_number. The old version produced incorrect results when run on directed graphs with bidirectional edges. The reason is that the old code used all\_neighbors to determine the set of neighbors to process; the issue is that all\_ne…

is a little bit over the threshold.  
To decide on your own I would suggest to extrapolate what would happen if all packages would do it like this.  
But on the other hand, it’s not that all other packages do this, so it’s just a minor issue here. 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/etiquette-question-on-posting-to-announcements/39193)._