# \`end\` flagged as missing coverage but loop was covered

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/end-flagged-as-missing-coverage-but-loop-was-covered/119754
**Category:** General Usage
**Tags:** coverage
**Created:** [September 23, 2024, 3:54pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/end-flagged-as-missing-coverage-but-loop-was-covered/119754 "2024-09-23T15:54:55Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![rafaelbailo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/rafaelbailo/32/215573_2.png) [@rafaelbailo](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/rafaelbailo)
#### Post date: [September 23, 2024, 3:54pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/end-flagged-as-missing-coverage-but-loop-was-covered/119754/1 "2024-09-23T15:54:56Z")

</div>

I’m looking at the Codecov coverage of [MultiPrecisionArrays.jl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ctkelley/MultiPrecisionArrays.jl/blob/main/src%2FFactorizations%2Fhlu!.jl#L79), and it seems there is and `end` statement marked as lacking coverage when the code inside the corresponding loop was executed. Is there something truly missing coverage, or is this just a bug?

Seems related to [this question](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/incorrect-coverage-report-that-flags-line-with-end/101767), which sadly remains unanswered.