That can be true, but in a scale different from interpreted languages. For instance, in this thread a highly optimized code obtains “only” a 6x speedup relative to the most natural implementations. Not 20x, 200x. The code without the optimization is still useful, and that optimization was a last resort. With other languages one simply cannot proceed before rewriting the critical parts, because the codes becomes too slow even for testing.
lmiq
160
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merge Python and Julia, i.e. an (unofficial) integration proposal, sort of like the Mojo language | 24 | 4055 | October 12, 2023 | |
| Advantages of Julia vs Mojo | 26 | 11323 | April 20, 2024 | |
| Why `Mojo` can be so fast? | 14 | 12523 | May 15, 2023 | |
| Julia: a post-mortem | 67 | 11165 | March 10, 2021 | |
| What Python Creator Guido van Rossum Thinks of Rust, Go, Julia, and TypeScript | 88 | 12318 | June 8, 2021 |