# Did Julia community do something to improve its correctness?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/did-julia-community-do-something-to-improve-its-correctness/102515
**Category:** General Usage
**Created:** [August 5, 2023, 7:16am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/did-julia-community-do-something-to-improve-its-correctness/102515 "2023-08-05T07:16:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 121

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mschauer](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mschauer/32/13946_2.png) [@mschauer](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/mschauer)
#### Post date: [August 8, 2023, 2:24pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/did-julia-community-do-something-to-improve-its-correctness/102515/121 "2023-08-08T14:24:03Z")

</div>

So here is a many page discussion about the reverse-zip bug I was about to fix, but when I saw from the lack of enthusiasm that the fix would mean having a PR lingering around for years again I left it be [Iterators.reverse gives unexpected results when zipping iterators of different lengths · Issue #25583 · JuliaLang/julia · GitHub](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/25583#issuecomment-367436289) (I had already with #24978 a PR that took 3 years and with #29927 one that took 2 years)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/did-julia-community-do-something-to-improve-its-correctness/102515)._
