# Dealing with flamebait

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/dealing-with-flamebait/56893>\
**Category:** Meta Discussion\
**Tags:** proposal\
**Created:** [March 10, 2021, 3:43pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/dealing-with-flamebait/56893 "2021-03-10T15:43:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 51

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamas\_Papp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tamas_papp/32/25949_2.png) [@Tamas\_Papp](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Tamas_Papp)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 1:14pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/dealing-with-flamebait/56893/51 "2021-03-23T13:14:42Z")

</div>

Anyone encountering this discussion: I expect that the following policy will solve this issue.

> [@POLICY: feedback discussion splitting](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policy-feedback-discussion-splitting/57362):
>
> We’re introducing a “feedback discussion splitting” policy on this forum. What this means is that while it’s totally ok for people to leave feedback on a broad set of subjects in a single message, rather than continuing the discussion of that feedback in a single thread, moderators will close the thread and request that if anyone wants to continue discussion of a specific subject, they do so in a new thread and link to the original post. Rationale The rationale for this policy is that posts in…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/dealing-with-flamebait/56893)._