# Creating a JuliaTeX group on github

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/creating-a-juliatex-group-on-github/6288>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** question\
**Created:** [October 6, 2017, 8:20am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/creating-a-juliatex-group-on-github/6288 "2017-10-06T08:20:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Azzaare](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/azzaare/32/21008_2.png) [@Azzaare](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Azzaare)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2017, 7:34am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/creating-a-juliatex-group-on-github/6288/20 "2017-10-10T07:34:28Z")

</div>

I suppose I will open a new post to signal this weird situation with the list of registered packages.

@stevengj, @bramtayl, I just published on GitHub a set of 3 packages to handle bibliography. Outside of BibTeX, it is currently just a backbone structure for a general bibliography group of packages. I detail this in [[Citations in docs - #26 by Azzaare](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/citations-in-docs/5066/26)], but basically, there is a package for an internal bibliography type, a set of packages (currently only bibtex) to parse bibliography languages, and one package to wrap all of that and manage import and export of citations.  
Now, I would be happy if I can merge those with the bibtex related packages mentioned above 🙂 (I tried to make my packages structure with modularity to ease the process)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/creating-a-juliatex-group-on-github/6288)._
