Next words are just my humble opinion (from “nobody” in Julia community) and I am open to change my mind! Something similar to this , that Julia has some performance issue or not excellent user experience or lack of functionality could be seen relatively often. (problems that have issue open several…

[image] favba: I really whish all the pre-compilation was done right after the Pkg.update(). Make sure to add a like to Precompile everything after Pkg.update() and friends · Issue #16409 · JuliaLang/julia · GitHub in that case! EDIT: Actually, maybe not even necessary, I just realized that …

[image] Liso: I really hope that AAA business model (not only because what was cited) Julia won’t follow. :wink: People criticize it because they paid for a product and the business uses them as testers. But that’s very different. With open source software, early adopters are testers. There’s…

[image] Yifan_Liu: PS: I personally think that the not-so-good user experience partly comes from Juno and Atom editor. After I switch to VS Code, everything gets quite smooth. My humble advice would be that: spend more resources on VS Code plug-in; make its own IDE (just think about Shiny and S…

[image] Liso: Repeatedly explain that 1.0 means only language stability freeze and it will be version with unprepared package ecosystem. As a long-time user of R and Python, I think R and Python by themselves are not so great (especially R), but they prosper with great packages. R and Python …

My own experience is that Atom is not as responsive as VS Code, I have not measured the time, but it is noticeably slow, especially when it comes to using package and plotting. It is not only slow by itself, it slows down my other software like R (RStudio) and Fortran (Code blocks). I remember that…

I agree that a feature freeze is needed, not that it should be called 1.0. Putting a feature freeze in 0.7 will be sufficient: Julia developers do read the Julia time lines, developers not (yet) into Julia will not. Julia does not have the market clout (as does Microsoft, people already know and ne…

Well, i have to say ‘ridiculous’ has -at least for me- the definition of ‘you read it and start laughing’. This could be formulated differently, but politness doesn’t apply here. It’s based on observation and experience.

That statement is made in a specific context (i.e. that something is a “showstopper”). Please do not pull things from the context. If you want to tell Kristoffer something than please send him a direct private message. You attack Kristoffer in public here and even mention his employer which certainl…

[image] tobias.knopp: attack Really?

:pensive: :pensive: :pensive: ← my feeling when I keep reading words like “ridiculous” on this forum. I don’t think @ScottPJones has attacked anyone. He shared his (correct) view about the lack of politeness of the word “ridiculous”, and highlighted that these words shouldn’t be used by someone fro…

Couldn't be good to postpone 1.0?

Internals & Design

Topic		Replies	Views
1.0 adoption path? General Usage	74	14862	July 21, 2018
The State of the Julia Ecosystem Community	108	9672	January 31, 2019
1.0 progress/status Internals & Design	60	20606	April 20, 2019
Julia v1.0-rc1 is now available Announcements release	60	7103	August 16, 2018
Julia 1.8, 1.9 (rapid release?) General Usage	16	3583	August 19, 2022

Couldn't be good to postpone 1.0?

Related topics