# Coordinate transforms doubt

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/coordinate-transforms-doubt/12695>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Created:** [July 28, 2018, 7:02am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/coordinate-transforms-doubt/12695 "2018-07-28T07:02:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![microlifecc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ed655f/32.png) [@microlifecc](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/microlifecc)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2018, 7:02am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/coordinate-transforms-doubt/12695/1 "2018-07-28T07:02:52Z")

</div>

Hi!  
So I am reading up on Coordinate Transforms and I stumbled upon [this](https://stackoverflow.com/a/39987510/4125790) post on Stackoverflow.  
At the bottom the author(Dan Getz) says that “transform takes the standard coordinates of the points in the volume (1:3 x 1:3 x 1:3 in this case), applies tfm on them, and looks in v for the result.”  
From an image perspective does this mean that the position of the extremities of the image coordinates like [1,1], [end,end] are found first after transformation and then the intensities of the intermediate pixels are then interpolated from the original image(using inverse transform?  
I am not sure if my understanding is correct!