In the Inference of a SDE section og the Turing tutorials the noise added to the states are described in the noise model with the \phi parameters. Is \sigma supposed to capture observation noise? What is its true value?

[image] zenkavi: Is σ\sigma supposed to capture observation noise? Yes. [image] zenkavi: What is its true value? odedata = Array(sol1) + 0.8 * randn(size(Array(sol1))) 0.8. That one needs a lot longer of a chain to converge though.

Confusion about parameter interpretation in Turing documentation

Specific Domains Probabilistic Programming

ChrisRackauckas February 8, 2021, 5:50pm 4

I set that when generating the data. In reality, it’s measurement noise.

Topic		Replies	Views
Turing package(s) + parameter estimation for DiffEq models? New to Julia	38	1642	August 7, 2020
Observation is sum of random variables in Turing Statistics statistics , turing	1	1070	October 6, 2018
Turing.jl slow inference Modelling & Simulations turing , modelingtoolkit	8	398	May 24, 2024
Adding uncertainty on timestep of Bayesian ODE solve through `saveat` Probabilistic Programming question , turing , differentialequation	9	203	October 1, 2024
Domain error for Turing model with callback Probabilistic Programming bayesian-inference , reversediff , differentialequation , diffeqcallbacks	33	2187	February 18, 2022

Confusion about parameter interpretation in Turing documentation

Related topics