# Confused about global vs local scoping in for loops in 1.0

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/confused-about-global-vs-local-scoping-in-for-loops-in-1-0/16318
**Category:** New to Julia
**Created:** [October 14, 2018, 7:16pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/confused-about-global-vs-local-scoping-in-for-loops-in-1-0/16318 "2018-10-14T19:16:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tamas\_Papp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tamas_papp/32/25949_2.png) [@Tamas\_Papp](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Tamas_Papp)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2018, 7:50am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/confused-about-global-vs-local-scoping-in-for-loops-in-1-0/16318/12 "2018-10-15T07:50:45Z")

</div>

> [@Ferran\_Mazzanti](#):
>
> Still somebody here pointed out that there is a big thread discussing that… can somebody please tell me which one is it?

> [@Another possible solution to the global scope debacle](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/another-possible-solution-to-the-global-scope-debacle/15894):
>
> The infamous issue [https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/28789](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/28789) has been on most of our minds for a while now. Although I’ve stopped posting there, I can tell you I’ve been thinking about it a lot, as have Stefan and Jameson and others, and we have continued discussing it off and on. We should really try to get it right. Last time around, we more-or-less settled on changing only the REPL, which has the main advantage of being non-breaking for most code. But after sleeping on it, it does not …

is one of the latest ones.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/confused-about-global-vs-local-scoping-in-for-loops-in-1-0/16318)._