# Computational Speed

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/computational-speed/22572>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** question\
**Created:** [March 31, 2019, 10:28pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/computational-speed/22572 "2019-03-31T22:28:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stevengj](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/stevengj/32/71_2.png) [@stevengj](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/stevengj)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2019, 12:19am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/computational-speed/22572/11 "2019-04-01T00:19:55Z")

</div>

FYI, benchmarking the inversion of a large matrix only depends on the BLAS library that is linked; it basically has nothing to do with the language. See also [OpenBLAS: Julia slower than R - #2 by stevengj](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/blas-julia-slower-than-r/21594/2)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/computational-speed/22572)._
