# Color scheme of JuliaHub package descriptions

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/color-scheme-of-juliahub-package-descriptions/110282>\
**Category:** Community\
**Tags:** juliahub\
**Created:** [February 16, 2024, 9:05am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/color-scheme-of-juliahub-package-descriptions/110282 "2024-02-16T09:05:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tbeason](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tbeason/32/15898_2.png) [@tbeason](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/tbeason)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2024, 2:12pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/color-scheme-of-juliahub-package-descriptions/110282/9 "2024-02-16T14:12:31Z")

</div>

> [@roflmaostc](#):
>
> actually miss that the amount of GitHub stars is not shown.

> [@JuliaHub package links and GitHub stars](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/juliahub-package-links-and-github-stars/110255/1):
>
> I like the fact that automatic links are now created on Discourse for packages. I am wondering however if the fact that the links point to JuliaHub instead of to GitHub might reduce the likelihood of people starring packages on GitHub. In the past, I would definitely star packages when directed there (GitHub) from an announcement or a thread on Discourse. I do not think I was alone in that behavior. Now that I am directed to JuliaHub, I believe I do this way less often. I don’t think GitHub s…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/color-scheme-of-juliahub-package-descriptions/110282)._