Many Julia projects use both coverage tools. What does everyone like or dislike about each service in terms of usability, accuracy, stability, etc?
I never seem to get coveralls to update, so I only use codecov for all mu projects at the moment. I find their web interface cleaner as well
I only use CodeCov. CodeCov supports automatic merging of reports (https://docs.codecov.io/docs/merging-reports).
As far as I can tell, Coveralls doesn’t automatically merge reports, so I can’t use Coveralls.
I also only use CodeCov. Using 2 different services for coverage reports at the same time feels very overkill.