# Can a package be registered that is not on v0.01, v0.1 or v1?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/can-a-package-be-registered-that-is-not-on-v0-01-v0-1-or-v1/98722
**Category:** Package Management
**Created:** [May 12, 2023, 8:07am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/can-a-package-be-registered-that-is-not-on-v0-01-v0-1-or-v1/98722 "2023-05-12T08:07:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sylvaticus](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/sylvaticus/32/203883_2.png) [@sylvaticus](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/sylvaticus)
#### Post date: [May 12, 2023, 8:07am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/can-a-package-be-registered-that-is-not-on-v0-01-v0-1-or-v1/98722/1 "2023-05-12T08:07:53Z")

</div>

Can I develop a package without register it and only when it is on a certain version, let’s say v0.5, register it ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![GunnarFarneback](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/gunnarfarneback/32/1827_2.png) [@GunnarFarneback](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/GunnarFarneback)
#### Post date: [May 12, 2023, 9:19am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/can-a-package-be-registered-that-is-not-on-v0-01-v0-1-or-v1/98722/2 "2023-05-12T09:19:14Z")

</div>

Yes. The General registry used to require specific numbers for automerge of the initial registration but that was disabled in [Disable the "standard initial version number" check by DilumAluthge · Pull Request #275 · JuliaRegistries/RegistryCI.jl · GitHub](https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/RegistryCI.jl/pull/275).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sylvaticus](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/sylvaticus/32/203883_2.png) [@sylvaticus](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/sylvaticus)
#### Post date: [May 12, 2023, 9:41am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/can-a-package-be-registered-that-is-not-on-v0-01-v0-1-or-v1/98722/3 "2023-05-12T09:41:45Z")

</div>

Ahh… this is why… I did remember it, but I couldn’t find a reference to it any more… thanks for the update ! (and good that the initial version check has been removed!)
