# Bringing (a bit) more guidance for #offtopic?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bringing-a-bit-more-guidance-for-offtopic/118470
**Category:** Meta Discussion
**Created:** [August 22, 2024, 1:53am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bringing-a-bit-more-guidance-for-offtopic/118470 "2024-08-22T01:53:06Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 57

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![goerz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/goerz/32/3269_2.png) [@goerz](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/goerz)
#### Post date: [April 3, 2025, 2:42pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bringing-a-bit-more-guidance-for-offtopic/118470/57 "2025-04-03T14:42:39Z")

</div>

I would actually not consider discussions about policies that directly affect the Julia community to be #Offtopic at all, but to firmly belong in the #Community category (or potentially #JuliaCon). That includes [calls for signing an open letter in support of public science](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/science-under-attack/127578). Maybe the thought was that the “science” community is only “adjacent” to the “Julia” community… but either way, there’s nothing inappropriate about it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bringing-a-bit-more-guidance-for-offtopic/118470)._
