# Bring Intel x86 simd sort library to Julia

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bring-intel-x86-simd-sort-library-to-julia/131719>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** package\
**Created:** [August 19, 2025, 8:00pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bring-intel-x86-simd-sort-library-to-julia/131719 "2025-08-19T20:00:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jling](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jling/32/212909_2.png) [@jling](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jling)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2025, 12:36am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bring-intel-x86-simd-sort-library-to-julia/131719/22 "2025-08-20T00:36:56Z")

</div>

> [@gitboy16](#):
>
> Which makes no sense at all 🤣

In the original post, it was explained quite clearly why AVX2 performance was bad in Julia

> [@Numpy.sort vs Julia sort](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/numpy-sort-vs-julia-sort/123421/9):
>
> This is because I was optimizing sorting while developing on an apple machine without AVX2. If we had cross-platform benchmark infrastructure in CI, Julia would likely be 10x faster in both cases.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bring-intel-x86-simd-sort-library-to-julia/131719)._