# Branching solution accepted although it violates presently added lazy constraints

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/branching-solution-accepted-although-it-violates-presently-added-lazy-constraints/80622
**Category:** Optimization (Mathematical)
**Tags:** jump, gurobi
**Created:** [May 6, 2022, 3:09pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/branching-solution-accepted-although-it-violates-presently-added-lazy-constraints/80622 "2022-05-06T15:09:45Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![miles.lubin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/miles.lubin/32/279_2.png) [@miles.lubin](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/miles.lubin)
#### Post date: [May 6, 2022, 3:49pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/branching-solution-accepted-although-it-violates-presently-added-lazy-constraints/80622/2 "2022-05-06T15:49:18Z")

</div>

By how much does the solution violate the constraint that you added? Gurobi could ignore the lazy constraint if it’s satisfied within Gurobi’s tolerances.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/branching-solution-accepted-although-it-violates-presently-added-lazy-constraints/80622)._
