# Bound checking in eachindex(x,y) in 1.7.3

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bound-checking-in-eachindex-x-y-in-1-7-3/83847
**Category:** Performance
**Created:** [July 6, 2022, 4:59pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bound-checking-in-eachindex-x-y-in-1-7-3/83847 "2022-07-06T16:59:29Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lmiq](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/lmiq/32/18314_2.png) [@lmiq](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/lmiq)
#### Post date: [July 6, 2022, 4:59pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bound-checking-in-eachindex-x-y-in-1-7-3/83847/1 "2022-07-06T16:59:29Z")

</div>

I noticed now that in 1.7.3 a code like this does not skip bounds checking:

```julia
julia> function f!(x,y)
           for i in eachindex(x,y)
               x[i] = x[i] + y[i]
           end
       end
f! (generic function with 1 method)

julia> x = rand(10^5); y = rand(10^5);

julia> @btime f!($x,$y)
  53.200 μs (0 allocations: 0 bytes)

```

vs.

```julia
julia> function f!(x,y)
           for i in eachindex(x,y)
               @inbounds x[i] = x[i] + y[i]
           end
       end
f! (generic function with 1 method)

julia> @btime f!($x,$y)
  28.550 μs (0 allocations: 0 bytes)

```

But it does in 1.8-rc1:

```julia
julia> function f!(x,y)
           for i in eachindex(x,y)
               x[i] = x[i] + y[i]
           end
       end
f! (generic function with 1 method)

julia> x = rand(10^5); y = rand(10^5);

julia> @btime f!($x,$y)
  29.804 μs (0 allocations: 0 bytes)

```

I don’t really have a question, I just thought this was sorted out by the compiler long ago. Since this seems to be only recently supported by the compiler, is there anything related we should aware about in terms of performance and best coding style? (I was just happy getting rid of all `@inbounds` in some code of mine, but I’ll wait for the next LTS now 🙂 ).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jishnub](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jishnub/32/33620_2.png) [@jishnub](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jishnub)
#### Post date: [July 6, 2022, 5:43pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bound-checking-in-eachindex-x-y-in-1-7-3/83847/2 "2022-07-06T17:43:00Z")

</div>

There might be other issues as well, e.g. [regression on inferring inbounds for `eachindex()` · Issue #45507 · JuliaLang/julia · GitHub](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/45507). Not using `@inbounds` sometimes makes llvm emit subpar code, even on 1.9 on a commonly used CPU. The issue might not even be bounds-checking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![lmiq](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/lmiq/32/18314_2.png) [@lmiq](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/lmiq)
#### Post date: [July 6, 2022, 5:50pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bound-checking-in-eachindex-x-y-in-1-7-3/83847/3 "2022-07-06T17:50:32Z")

</div>

In my example the native code appears to be bounds-checking in 1.7.3, as it shows lines like this:

```julia
	movabsq	$jl_bounds_error_ints, %rax

```

which are not present in the 1.8-rc1 native code. (although my understanding of native code is minimal)