# Best approach to smooth array? None of my approaches are very useful

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/best-approach-to-smooth-array-none-of-my-approaches-are-very-useful/17633
**Category:** Performance
**Tags:** images, statistics, smoothing
**Created:** [November 17, 2018, 5:33am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/best-approach-to-smooth-array-none-of-my-approaches-are-very-useful/17633 "2018-11-17T05:33:30Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![rafael.guerra](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/rafael.guerra/32/216610_2.png) [@rafael.guerra](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/rafael.guerra)
#### Post date: [May 6, 2021, 10:23pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/best-approach-to-smooth-array-none-of-my-approaches-are-very-useful/17633/19 "2021-05-06T22:23:23Z")

</div>

@aramirezreyes, have you looked at [FastConv.jl](https://github.com/aamini/FastConv.jl)?

The package seems to be broken but looking at the code and description they seem to implement the same idea of performing direct convolution with small kernels as in the code posted by @sijo [here](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/seven-lines-of-julia-examples-sought/50416/48).

From your posts above it seems that you had tried something similar but if you could please confirm, it would be helpful.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/best-approach-to-smooth-array-none-of-my-approaches-are-very-useful/17633)._