# Base.@kwdef for v1.0?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/base-kwdef-for-v1-0/21954
**Category:** Internals & Design
**Created:** [March 17, 2019, 5:08am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/base-kwdef-for-v1-0/21954 "2019-03-17T05:08:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![anon67531922](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/48db29/32.png) [@anon67531922](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/anon67531922)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2019, 6:09am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/base-kwdef-for-v1-0/21954/4 "2019-03-17T06:09:14Z")

</div>

Thanks @Tamas_Papp 👍

That is an interesting trail of posts. This [comment](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/proposed-release-process-and-schedule/15623) here is particularly interesting:

> [@Proposed release process and schedule](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/proposed-release-process-and-schedule/15623/1):
>
> Once 1.1 comes out, 1.0 will be the new LTS branch since it’s the only other release branch; but after 1.2 comes out, we have a choice between keeping 1.0 as the LTS branch for longer or making 1.1 the new LTS branch. We’ll have to see how people feel and what the demand is.

I think we can hope that when 1.2 comes out that 1.1 becomes the new LTS branch and then we get all the benefits of 1.1 without needing to worry about 1.0 🙏

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/base-kwdef-for-v1-0/21954)._