# Backtesting framework

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/backtesting-framework/47351
**Category:** Finance and Economics
**Tags:** package, finance
**Created:** [September 27, 2020, 7:36am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/backtesting-framework/47351 "2020-09-27T07:36:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![g-gundam](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/g-gundam/32/47593_2.png) [@g-gundam](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/g-gundam)
#### Post date: [November 24, 2024, 5:25am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/backtesting-framework/47351/13 "2024-11-24T05:25:57Z")

</div>

Lucky.jl has a really interesting architecture. I just wish it were easier to use it with OnlineTechnicalIndicators.jl. I see that you even started an [issue](https://github.com/oliviermilla/Lucky.jl/issues/14) asking him about it.

I’ve been thinking about this problem space for a while, and the way he used Rocket.jl to organize his data pipeline feels elegant. He did a lot of things right. Even if I don’t end up using Lucky.jl for my own work, I think I will take a lot of inspiration from it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/backtesting-framework/47351)._