The State of Julia for Scientific Machine Learning A brief survey. Considers why Julia isn’t more popular vs. Python & Jax. Finds calling Julia from other languages difficult.

Sure, it’s just easy to forget that there are real people behind some work, especially if they aren’t speaking up here. My post was aimed to be more preventative than scolding — just a nudge to keep the criticism constructive — but I can see it may have misfired a bit. Knowing a bit about the autho…

It’s good to see this topic get attention in general. There are some issues with this preprint (I see the existance of Supposition.jl for PBT is missed, for instance), but also some rather valid comments such as: Complex Debugging Messages On a language level, Julia’s error messages have continua…

This has been on my list to respond to for a while. I know Eddie and Jacob personally – we are part of the same department (Mathematics) and we usually see each other either passing through our lounge or at the weekly department tea time :tea: (sadly missing it today due to a conference). I want t…

Since I may be looking at Machine Learning myself in the near future, in the context of quantum control , I found it interesting that according to this preprint, the limitations of Julia in the context of machine learning aren’t at all specific to machine learning. These are the same pain points (“la…

Jax has also released a few very broken releases over the last few weeks making this point laughable

[image] Palli: While calling Python, R, C, and C++ functions in Julia is easy with the PyCall.jl [ 54 ], RCall.jl [ 60 ], and the Julia standard library function ccall [ 61 ], the converse is often extremely difficult and unintuitive as you need to explicitly manage Julia’s context and the passing of …

I wouldn’t pay too much attention to this paper. It looks like somebody felt like they needed to publish something to get their number of academic papers higher for the year end. I doubt this is the case given the credentials, but as already asked for in arXiv: "The State of Julia for Scientific …

@world-peace , I can no longer quote your post, but to answer you, there’s e.g. this use case: Getting Started with Julia's SciML for the Python User · Overview of Julia's... Documentation for Overview of Julia's SciML. To a Python developer, SciML is SciPy…

To maybe get this thread back on track: [image] world-peace: Does anyone have a genuine usecase for calling Julia from another language? Here’s an example for a Python package using Julia as a numerical backend: QuanEstimation . It’s perhaps not the most common use case, but I wouldn’t call …

[image] world-peace: It is unusual to call a dynamic language runtime from somewhere else. One of the most popular Julia packages (at least early on) is Pyplot.jl, which allows you to interface with matplotlib, through Python. This is a typical example, calling libraries in a different langua…

arXiv: "The State of Julia for Scientific Machine Learning" by Berman & Ginesin

Specific Domains Machine Learning

Topic		Replies	Views
State of machine learning in Julia Machine Learning	60	66841	August 26, 2022
Where does Julia provide the biggest benefits over other ML frameworks for research? Machine Learning	34	10766	September 16, 2019
Gradual Julia-ization of Python libraries General Usage package , python , pythoncall	36	3948	July 18, 2025
On Machine Learning and Programming Languages Machine Learning	48	9006	January 25, 2018
Is PyJulia org, e.g. juliacall (or pyjulia) Python packages maintained? New to Julia	36	3215	February 3, 2024

arXiv: "The State of Julia for Scientific Machine Learning" by Berman & Ginesin

Related topics