# Arguing about sloppy science

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/arguing-about-sloppy-science/114103>\
**Category:** Offtopic\
**Created:** [May 9, 2024, 11:15am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/arguing-about-sloppy-science/114103 "2024-05-09T11:15:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eben60](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/eben60/32/13475_2.png) [@Eben60](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Eben60)\
**Post date:** [May 10, 2024, 10:30am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/arguing-about-sloppy-science/114103/13 "2024-05-10T10:30:42Z")

</div>

> [@oheil](#):
>
> This “science nowadays…” bullshit is just wrong.

> [@Why is it reliable to use open source packages for research?](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-it-reliable-to-use-open-source-packages-for-research/113823/44):
>
> _I dismissed nobody._ I argue against some implications these general statements imply and which are in my opinion just wrong. And I try to do this in a non-general explicit way.

Apparently we have different idea of of the meaning of word “dismissing”. OK, English is not my first language.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/arguing-about-sloppy-science/114103)._