I found this approach in Rotations.jl. Why code it this way? Note that AngleAxis is a concrete type, so AA can only be one type. @inline function (::Type{AA})(q::QuatRotation) where AA <: AngleAxis w = real(q.q) x, y, z = imag_part(q.q) s2 = x * x + y * y + z * z sin_t2 = sqrt(s2) …

No the signatures look the same AFAICT. These aren’t really callable structs. It is a strange way to write a constructor, but I can’t seem to find a difference. This can be used to do certain “Abstract” constructors but AngleAxis is a struct so I’m not sure the purpose.

Are these type functors the same as Outer Constructors?

General Usage

Oscar_Smith February 22, 2024, 6:53pm 2

No. These are callable structs (see Function factories or callable structs?)

Topic		Replies	Views
Help defining Functor type General Usage question , functors	8	1015	June 28, 2017
CoordinateTransformations.jl usage arguments? New to Julia	4	861	December 15, 2017
Grouping Rotation objects in a vector New to Julia parametric-types , structtypes	8	997	June 14, 2021
Can this be done with an outer constructor? New to Julia	2	439	May 22, 2020
New blog post about Julia parametric types and constructors Teaching & Outreach parametric-types , constructors	11	583	October 8, 2024

Are these type functors the same as Outer Constructors?

Related topics