# Are PkgEval badges from JuliaHub and NanosolderReports based on the same results?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/are-pkgeval-badges-from-juliahub-and-nanosolderreports-based-on-the-same-results/58455>\
**Category:** Tooling\
**Tags:** question, package\
**Created:** [April 2, 2021, 4:55pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/are-pkgeval-badges-from-juliahub-and-nanosolderreports-based-on-the-same-results/58455 "2021-04-02T16:55:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Norman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/97f17d/32.png) [@Norman](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Norman)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2021, 4:55pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/are-pkgeval-badges-from-juliahub-and-nanosolderreports-based-on-the-same-results/58455/1 "2021-04-02T16:55:37Z")

</div>

It seems that the PkgEval badges from [NanosolderReports](https://github.com/JuliaCI/NanosoldierReports) are based on the daily run on nightly build of Julia.

What about those badges from [JuliaHub](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-badges-on-juliahub/44635)? Are they generated from the same data used for NanosolderReports? Most importantly, I am wondering whether the packages are also evaluated on nightly build of Julia or some other versions?